Waraxe IT Security Portal
Login or Register
November 16, 2024
Menu
Home
Logout
Discussions
Forums
Members List
IRC chat
Tools
Base64 coder
MD5 hash
CRC32 checksum
ROT13 coder
SHA-1 hash
URL-decoder
Sql Char Encoder
Affiliates
y3dips ITsec
Md5 Cracker
User Manuals
AlbumNow
Content
Content
Sections
FAQ
Top
Info
Feedback
Recommend Us
Search
Journal
Your Account
User Info
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: MichaelSnaRe
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 9144

People Online:
Visitors: 62
Members: 0
Total: 62
Full disclosure
SEC Consult SA-20241112-0 :: Multiple vulnerabilities in Siemens Energy Omnivise T3000 (CVE-2024-38876, CVE-2024-38877, CVE-2024-38878, CVE-2024-38879)
Security issue in the TX Text Control .NET Server for ASP.NET.
SEC Consult SA-20241107-0 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in HASOMED Elefant and Elefant Software Updater
Unsafe eval() in TestRail CLI
4 vulnerabilities in ibmsecurity
32 vulnerabilities in IBM Security Verify Access
xlibre Xnest security advisory & bugfix releases
APPLE-SA-10-29-2024-1 Safari 18.1
SEC Consult SA-20241030-0 :: Query Filter Injection in Ping Identity PingIDM (formerly known as ForgeRock Identity Management) (CVE-2024-23600)
SEC Consult SA-20241023-0 :: Authenticated Remote Code Execution in Multiple Xerox printers (CVE-2024-6333)
APPLE-SA-10-28-2024-8 visionOS 2.1
APPLE-SA-10-28-2024-7 tvOS 18.1
APPLE-SA-10-28-2024-6 watchOS 11.1
APPLE-SA-10-28-2024-5 macOS Ventura 13.7.1
APPLE-SA-10-28-2024-4 macOS Sonoma 14.7.1
Log in Register Forum FAQ Memberlist Search
IT Security and Insecurity Portal

www.waraxe.us Forum Index -> All other hashes -> LM and NTLM Hash decryption Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 70, 71, 72 ... 76, 77, 78Next
Post new topicReply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:05 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




Ok it seems that LANMAN is disabled and NTMLv1 only is in use because the
LM hash and NT hash are the same and ofc on the pics it also says NTMLv1 or NTLM + challenge only. Its not that easier to crack the pw Wink It would be better if LM where also enabled. But I will give it a try but I doubt that I will find it
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:16 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
Ok it seems that LANMAN is disabled and NTMLv1 only is in use because the
LM hash and NT hash are the same and ofc on the pics it also says NTMLv1 or NTLM + challenge only. Its not that easier to crack the pw Wink It would be better if LM where also enabled. But I will giv it a try


Thanks a lot Mullog. Smile

I was doing some more research on Cain and Abel and found out about challenge spoofing. I was able to generate an NTLMv1 hash with a spoofed challenge. You can check out the same at the link below if it is of any help to you.

http://i49.tinypic.com/qss5u8.jpg

The most frustrating thing is that my laptop has been scheduled to perform a daily incremental backup on the network hard drive (Apple's Time Capsule) but I can't somehow access it directly. I am pretty sure that the login details are stored somewhere in my laptop but don't know where. I have checked Credentials Manager, but of no use. Therefore, I have to use these complex methods to be able to break into the network hard drive.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:22 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
Ok it seems that LANMAN is disabled and NTMLv1 only is in use because the
LM hash and NT hash are the same and ofc on the pics it also says NTMLv1 or NTLM + challenge only. Its not that easier to crack the pw Wink It would be better if LM where also enabled. But I will give it a try but I doubt that I will find it


Also, since my laptop has access to the network hard drive if there is a way to further downgrade from 'NTLMv1 + Challenge' to 'LM', please let me know. I will do it and generate another hash, by performing a backup, and post it here.

In short I can generate the hash anytime by clicking on the backup button. If you know of a way to generate a hash that follows LM, please let me know.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:40 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




I think now you can attack it with rainbow tables but I'm not sure and I do not have them.
Sorry I dont know how to do that. How did you changed it to NTMLv1 in first place ? In the registry? If there is anything with Compatibility or Level change it to 0
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:50 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
I think now you can attack it with rainbow tables but I'm not sure and I do not have them.
Sorry I dont know how to do that. How did you changed it to NTMLv1 in first place ? In the registry? If there is anything with Compatibility or Level change it to 0


Changed it from Local Security Settings.

Actually, I also found out a way to force my laptop to generate LM hash (after reading your last post) but it will work only after my company's IT administrator resets the password (as we can not generate a weaker hash for the same password).
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:59 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




Ok so no LM hash then?
I found something that may help
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_interopscenarios/thread/c8f488ed-1b96-4e06-bd65-390aa41138d1
or
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itpronetworking/thread/e1113944-6a5d-4ade-8590-90d1bae25b73/
post nr.3

ps: no result for your hash Sad
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:10 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
Ok so no LM hash then?
I found something that may help
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_interopscenarios/thread/c8f488ed-1b96-4e06-bd65-390aa41138d1
or
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itpronetworking/thread/e1113944-6a5d-4ade-8590-90d1bae25b73/
post nr.3


I have already done all this. It does not help because besides my local security settings the default settings of the network hard drive also matter. I may tone down my Local Security Settings to the lowest extent possible but still there are some default security settings at the network location which I can not tweak, in which case my laptop (client) will adapt to the security settings of the network location.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:34 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




aah ok know I understand ^^ I thought you can change the the security settings of the network hard drive, too(In retrospect, its very stupid from me Smile). Maybe there is an exploit but with such things I cant help you, sorry.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:58 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
aah ok know I understand ^^ I thought you can change the the security settings of the network hard drive, too(In retrospect, its very stupid from me Smile). Maybe there is an exploit but with such things I cant help you, sorry.


Yes. But you are at least going to try to decrypt the hash for me, isn't it?? Please don't say no. Smile
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:31 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




yes but its looking bad
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:36 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Mullog wrote:
yes but its looking bad


Yes, I thought so otherwise there would have been a lot of search results on the internet.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:33 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




OneGuy wrote:
Plz crack th e first part of this LM&NTLM+Challenge hash

Code:
81A50FD991CD11F24DAA83A3F77B56EE834AEE2A7A26F476:7EBAE76F67F0D2A37B0044D3BDF8350169812342D79CAE29:1122334455667788
Result: ???????L1#


Many thanx


Sailsail1#

OneGuy wrote:
Please crak this LM&NTLM+Challenge

Code:
9BFEB79136472857192706DFFDECA14CC7EEDE96E30422D4:A3C34983F4765D799FD43A6C3223DA34A1133B6C1391B52E:1122334455667788


Thanx


9BFEB79136472857192706DFFDECA14CC7EEDE96E30422D4:JULLANA???????

OneGuy wrote:
Anyone can help me crack this LM&NTLM+Challenge hash

Code:
0C4A7AA399CBE62E95E22FA6C5DCCABD2F85252CC731BB25:7A546774795F70EDCC2FC20A643899F8BE9C989BAC08050F:1122334455667788


Thanx


0C4A7AA399CBE62E95E22FA6C5DCCABD2F85252CC731BB25:KASBAH@???????
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:13 am Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Hello Mullog

Looks like it is indeed possible to break NTLM + Challenge hash. Have you been able to make much headway into the hash I submitted? Eagerly waiting for that.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 4:01 pm Reply with quote
Mullog
Advanced user
Advanced user
Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 540




Yeah but only with LM hash you can see
because there are only cpu based cracker out there who can handle LM/NTLM + Challenge hashes its looking very bad for your hash. I tried wordlists with some rules and BF but without a result, sry.

Have you any hints how the pw could look like?
I think if the admin understands just a little bit of password security it will be impossible to crack with wordlists and will take too long with brute force.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 4:23 pm Reply with quote
dev1712
Regular user
Regular user
Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 11




Hmmm yes I agree. Let me try to generate the LM hash also by some way. Thanks a lot for all your efforts.
View user's profile Send private message
LM and NTLM Hash decryption
www.waraxe.us Forum Index -> All other hashes
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT
Page 71 of 78
Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 70, 71, 72 ... 76, 77, 78Next
Post new topicReply to topic


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group



Space Raider game for Android, free download - Space Raider gameplay video - Zone Raider mobile games
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments and posts are property of their posters, all the rest (c) 2004-2024 Janek Vind "waraxe"
Page Generation: 0.054 Seconds